You are absolutely correct. The report became public the minute the County Attorney desided against criminal charges. My objection with the premise was the way the report was sometimes used. Remember these report contain hearsay and gut feelings of investigators not all ways pure facts. They are intended to aid the prosecutor with their thoughts. All this being said, It is public information.
I'm curious how the legislation as proposed compares to the time when under Pres. Clinton there were strict limits and eligibility placed on welfare recipients of all kinds.
It seems over the years we've stepped away from limits imposed during the Clinton years and what is in effect today.
Are there any comparisons available so we understand the context in more detail.
In deference to all, I believe it was a Republican Congress and a Democrat President when welfare was severely restricted.
You are absolutely correct. The report became public the minute the County Attorney desided against criminal charges. My objection with the premise was the way the report was sometimes used. Remember these report contain hearsay and gut feelings of investigators not all ways pure facts. They are intended to aid the prosecutor with their thoughts. All this being said, It is public information.
Hi Ed,
I like the article; thank you for sharing.
I'm curious how the legislation as proposed compares to the time when under Pres. Clinton there were strict limits and eligibility placed on welfare recipients of all kinds.
It seems over the years we've stepped away from limits imposed during the Clinton years and what is in effect today.
Are there any comparisons available so we understand the context in more detail.
In deference to all, I believe it was a Republican Congress and a Democrat President when welfare was severely restricted.
Thanks,
Mike